Sounds cool, as long as it happens to others. I'd actually get rid of giving any value to 'being online', so to avoid players preparing an assault only to find out they can't attack, but it's better than nothing.

Whilst I still can't hit a ton of other players as they are 'online' (and there's a ton of always-on dudes at the higher levels), I'm constantly being raided when i'm actively playing. Including during this RAID's beauty where, instead of the 'successful assaulted' pop-up, i got this great...

FINALLY!

...but why do you HAVE TO get the bonus? I'm sorry, i don't share this view and, whilst i understand that it's bad they havent fixed many of the obvious annoying 'issues' (inbalances?), i don't see how this addition is bad. So i like it :)

that doesn't make sense, nothing was changed when it comes to dice. So how's this update BAD? :|

? I dont see what makes my argument not valid, since you're not really answering what you're quoting. Again, the update provides chances for those WITHOUT the ability to no deploy everyone, and it does NOT hurt those that can deploy everyone. How's it bad then?

not everyone is bombing the finca and, in the later stages, that would've been an issue for top levels because you can hardly deploy against a 60+ base with proper layout and abilities. With the update, you have MORE chances to deploy, whereas you dont really loose the ability to no-deploy. This...

...am i the only one liking the update? :/

such fair, fun game :/ 5th place is 555 medals (!!!) ahead of 6th place. Apparently it doesn't let me post links now...b/c that's spam. Add 'censorship' to the list of things going your way, FTX :)

2) is a feature so simple to implement, so asked for yet so utterly disregarded. I've had it wasting dozens of minutes picking up the right team for an opponent when, in fact, FTX could've done it so that i'd always have '3 decks' saved. Again, this game could've been so cool.

...nothing has changed this week either, even though i had a, ehm, strategy in place. it's bonkers.

This is nonsense, you guys @FTX could ALWAYS make it so that tourneys start with players around the same number of medals; there's a large enough player base that'll ensure everyone is like 20-30medals AT MOST away from 1st AND 25th, yet you keep this biased, totally random system for over an...

Yeap, that's right. The only time I actually had a chance I was just 270medals away from 5th place. Unfortunately (for me), the 5th placed player also went strong for it. This is yet another nail in the coffin and proof of the amateurish job here at FTX, @Chase - FTX Games. Being unable to...

incorrect, the same rewards are present. "Olga" from FTX says 'they figured it'll be fun' and that 'they'll pass the feedback around'. The word balancing really doesn't mean much around these places.

LOL indeed, i'm fairly new to the game and still can't believe that they're apparently doing it all wrong, from support to offers to updates; it's like they could write a manual on 'how NOT to run a business'. They'd be top of their class. Amazing.

again 20/6?! Wtf, is this how 'they're passing support'? I can't believe the level of inbalance they're throwing at this game.

^^ ? I thought it was obvious i dont.

I am quitting the game, i don't feel the need to get the gold needed to move my BBs to Scorpions, only to see them nerf those again. This is an utter joke of a development and i regret wasting my money and, most noticeably, time.

Why are Scorpions the 'hard limit'? Is not like stuffing Diegos/Broskos with BBs didn't require dice (...gold!) nor talents (...uhm, gold). Imho, if people stays on when they basically render missilers useless, they shouldn't quit when they render Scorpions useless. And if they will...

I'm definitely not investing that same ~60k to switch them to Scorpios, only to have @Chase - FTX Games block that again. I've been fooled around by this 'business' and I'm going to cut the looses now. For real, this time. I've never ever seen a greedier approach and imbalance in a game i...