So why cherry pick the replays that work the best for your argument if you have no clue how to play them yourself?
It's a rather easy contradiction of his statement.
never offended my friend, you too.
I have a lower level account and a high level account so I also see both sides so I concur that maybe level grouping would have been better. I do not agree though that someone is a lesser player just because they do not use Davids. I use Davids and Fuegos and sometimes I use FB sicarios and Torchers. I know several players that are really good with Torchers even against the elite bases.It's a rather easy contradiction of his statement.
Breaking it down simply:
He see's something and then creates a generalization based on what he's "seen" in HIS personal experience and calls upon that purely as a global truth to fit his argument. When the fact remains that many players can flawless/minimal loss rush warden tower bases, just because he hasn't seen it, doesn't mean it doesn't exist, because it very much does!
It all applies to the correlation of David rushing being more dominant at higher levels than lower levels, which implores questioning the decision of allowing a L60 in wood III, to get 5 pts rushing while a L20 gets 1 and has less bases to consume for said pts making it near impossible to catch up.
Each side of the argument could also be flipped, L30 David rusher vs L60 no david rusher, L60 rusher vs L30 newbie. The only way to truely fix the issue IMO, is completely segregating leagues by level and/or unstacking David's abilities.
Willfully ignoring objectivity because of personal bias (he got what works best for him, therefore it's good for all in his eyes) thus he can't see anything wrong with the update, and sits in the realm of willful ignorance.
My 64 loves the update, my 33 w/92 pt lead, was just jumped by a 59. I can see both sides, he can't.
No, it's not the same to play at 50-60 and 60-70 levels, it's much harder to play at a higher level, and even with Davids. Simply, if you are a higher level this game is much heavier for you. I think this is not ideal, but it's a good idea for a balance.
Well, I don't think so, since both guys who were below me now are ahead. The difference is 80+ points per day, that means they strike same amount I did, no other way to beat me so hard in one day - these 2 players are LullinBoys and PomiLo Unstoppable.
I have the same problem
Although I agree that level range grouping based on medals probably would be better, I am not inclined to agree with this statement. I have never had anyone beat my base in recent months without losses....deploy attack or s2f. I am sure that there are some that can but I wouldn’t refer to them as average players.
Same here iT is only getting worse
