Is reusing sicarios in a war cheating

[Julio]

Fellas, reusing undeployed sicarios has been in the game ever since I started playing 6 months ago, the developers know it and it is actually an intentional game design, not a bug. It's understandable though; if your air strikes is powerful enough to destroy a base without deploying some or all troops, and you're willing to sacrifice the damage points (Which directly affect war rewards for both of the raider and cartel) then you're allowed to reuse those undeployed sicarios. Although, in most atrociously mismatched wars, players would be able to pull no deploys with full damage (Like those 4 Quicas of Crabnutz like to do) in a combination of airstrikes and paratroopers. Is it always fair? Probably not. Is it cheating? Definitely not.

And you say it's an intentional design based on what information. Did a developer tell you this? Do you have access to different information than what is printed in the game?

I don't understand how you can make that statement.

 

[Julio]

perhaps @Chase - FTX Games can get definitive feedback.

 

[MAXIMUS]

@Chase - FTX Games , when a player attacks another player during a war using a no deploy strategy (missiles only for example), the game allows them to reuse their sicarios.

Is this a bug or intentional?

If it is intentional, I don't understand why that would be the case. Please explain.

If it is unintentional, and players are systematically using the same sicarios repeatedly, wouldn't that be cheating?

More wonderful topics by Julio

 

[Marv]

Fellas, reusing undeployed sicarios has been in the game ever since I started playing 6 months ago, the developers know it and it is actually an intentional game design, not a bug. It's understandable though; if your air strikes is powerful enough to destroy a base without deploying some or all troops, and you're willing to sacrifice the damage points (Which directly affect war rewards for both of the raider and cartel) then you're allowed to reuse those undeployed sicarios. Although, in most atrociously mismatched wars, players would be able to pull no deploys with full damage (Like those 4 Quicas of Crabnutz like to do) in a combination of airstrikes and paratroopers. Is it always fair? Probably not. Is it cheating? Definitely not.

7 months ago it wasnt in the game.
Problem started 6 months ago when you start playing.
Mayby your the guilty one

 

[Julio]

well, i got a definitive answer back from support (I know, shocking isn't it? ). They said it is okay to reuse sicarios who don't deploy.

Okay, I guess that settles that.

 

[Bako Bullyz]

well, i got a definitive answer back from support (I know, shocking isn't it? ). They said it is okay to reuse sicarios who don't deploy.

Okay, I guess that settles that.

So it's not cheating it's called strategy

 

[zecke2]

So it's not cheating it's called strategy

Which shows only the own developers do not know how their game should work.
Than they must do adjust there game manuel so that all players know that .

 

[MAXIMUS]

Its called the way the phucking game is


Anymore great topics Julio Domingez?

 

[sky_high]

poor game design isn't cheating it's just a poorly designed game and they admitted it lol.

 

[Julio]

Its called the way the phucking game is


Anymore great topics Julio Domingez?

Hmmmm, you don't like my topics? Would you prefer I just troll the forum?

 

[EgregiousParagon.]

Called it. It was there for a long time. You and your cartel are penalized for missile-ling the finca by low award damage [should be the same for rest of the game].

 

[Bako Bullyz]

Which shows only the own developers do not know how their game should work.
Than they must do adjust there game manuel so that all players know that .

 

[Marv]

Hmmmm, you don't like my topics? Would you prefer I just troll the forum?

i prefer the trolling